Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A65
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Launched November 2011
- Successor is Sony A68
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A65 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Sony A65, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and A65 (24MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) have different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-PL9 was launched 6 years after the A65 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-PL9 matches up against the A65 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A65 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Sony SLT-A65. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Sony A65
| E-PL9 | A65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 | November 2011 | More modern by 76 months | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 921k | Crisper display (+119k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-PL9
| A65 | E-PL9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony A65
| E-PL9 | A65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL9 offers outer measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Sony A65 has measurements of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL9 versus Sony A65 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL9 and the A65.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and A65 is 85 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching specifications. The pic here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and A65.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PL9 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A65 will render more detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The fresher E-PL9 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A65 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony SLT-A65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony SLT-A65 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2018-02-08 | 2011-11-15 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 15 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Number of lenses | 107 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 10.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 380g (0.84 lb) | 622g (1.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 717 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 560 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $599 | $700 |