Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A68
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64


64 Imaging
66 Features
70 Overall
67
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A68 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
- Launched November 2015
- Older Model is Sony A65

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A68 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony A68, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and A68 (24MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and A68 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.

The E-PL9 was unveiled 2 years later than the A68 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A68 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-PL9 scores versus the A68 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A68 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Sony SLT-A68. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Sony A68 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Sony A68
E-PL9 | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | November 2015 | Fresher by 28 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper screen (+579k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Olympus E-PL9
A68 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony A68
E-PL9 | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 features outer dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Sony A68 has sizing of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony A68 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL9 and the A68.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and A68 is 85 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and A68.
As you have seen, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A68 will give more detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 provides an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A68 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony SLT-A68 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony SLT-A68 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2015-11-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 79 |
Cross type focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 lbs) | 610g (1.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 701 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 510 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $599 | $581 |