Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony ZV-E10
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
86 Imaging
70 Features
92 Overall
78
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony ZV-E10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Announced February 2018
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Boost to 51200)
- 3840 x 1920 video
- Sony E Mount
- 343g - 115 x 64 x 45mm
- Launched July 2021
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony ZV-E10 Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony ZV-E10, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and ZV-E10 (24MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and ZV-E10 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL9 was announced 4 years prior to the ZV-E10 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-PL9 matches up versus the ZV-E10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony ZV-E10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Sony ZV-E10. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Sony ZV-E10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Sony ZV-E10
| E-PL9 | ZV-E10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Sharper display (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony ZV-E10 over the Olympus E-PL9
| ZV-E10 | E-PL9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2021 | February 2018 | More recent by 42 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony ZV-E10
| E-PL9 | ZV-E10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony ZV-E10 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL9 features outer dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Sony ZV-E10 has proportions of 115mm x 64mm x 45mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 343 grams (0.76 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony ZV-E10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL9 versus the ZV-E10.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and ZV-E10 is 85 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony ZV-E10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and ZV-E10.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Sony ZV-E10 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The older E-PL9 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony ZV-E10 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony ZV-E10 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony ZV-E10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony ZV-E10 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2018-02-08 | 2021-07-30 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 32000 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 425 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Available lenses | 107 | 150 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 1920 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 1920 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x1920 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lbs) | 343 grams (0.76 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 115 x 64 x 45mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | 440 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $599 | $699 |