Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dc20/6dc204eefb71a9ef5bae01d9c451d4e7b9454420" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM1 front Olympus PEN E-PM1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9e45/e9e457397531c200c69a31ad07004097ef5a77b7" alt="Olympus Stylus 5010 front Olympus Stylus 5010 front"
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched November 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju 5010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact and both are created by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PM1 (12MP) and the 5010 (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and 5010 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PM1 was unveiled 23 months after the 5010 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 5010 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-PM1 grades against the 5010 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM1 & Olympus Stylus 5010. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PM1 Gallery & Olympus 5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Olympus 5010
E-PM1 | 5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 23 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Olympus E-PM1
5010 | E-PM1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Olympus 5010
E-PM1 | 5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM1 has got physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) and the Olympus 5010 has sizing of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PM1 compared to the 5010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21c7a/21c7a46520c09ea83f2b37b509eddfabf044b529" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 size comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM1 and 5010 is 89 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45544/45544672fe9e47ad5f4f75901a1a0ad03ffa4eaf" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The pic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM1 and 5010.
All in all, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM1 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus 5010 will offer you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger E-PM1 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ca07/6ca078e7a06d4be9052a68c7f780126535e992dd" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b65d/9b65dc67ed27cc07265d7cd7eedd774eedcd3625" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus 5010 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Olympus Stylus 5010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Olympus Stylus 5010 |
Also called | - | mju 5010 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-11-23 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 7cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 265 gr (0.58 lb) | 126 gr (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $499 | $150 |