Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dc20/6dc204eefb71a9ef5bae01d9c451d4e7b9454420" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM1 front Olympus PEN E-PM1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched November 2011
- Successor is Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Olympus E-PM1 versus Olympus TG-850 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PM1 (12MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-PM1 was brought out 3 years prior to the TG-850 iHS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-PM1 matches up vs the TG-850 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PM1 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM1 Gallery and Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-PM1 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-PM1
TG-850 iHS | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | November 2011 | More recent by 26 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-PM1 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM1 features exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-850 iHS has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PM1 versus Olympus TG-850 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-PM1 and the TG-850 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d4ed/4d4edf11c81f991d4b0203c80f5128d795aac40c" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM1 and TG-850 iHS is 89 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b38c5/b38c59d2e1afca75b1e20e63ebcbe08b9f41f24d" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM1 and TG-850 iHS.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PM1 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus TG-850 iHS will deliver greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-PM1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c0dd/1c0dde16258fa47edb9df5914172612fad7f98bb" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91a39/91a39d389edd258d26c682f385f63555806e5452" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2011-11-23 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4616 x 3464 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/2 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 265 grams (0.58 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 330 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $499 | $250 |