Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dc20/6dc204eefb71a9ef5bae01d9c451d4e7b9454420" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM1 front Olympus PEN E-PM1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced November 2011
- Later Model is Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PM1 (12MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PM1 was launched 11 months later than the TG-310 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-PM1 matches up versus the TG-310 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM1 and Olympus TG-310. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM1 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Olympus TG-310
E-PM1 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 11 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-PM1
TG-310 | E-PM1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Olympus TG-310
E-PM1 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM1 features outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PM1 compared to the TG-310.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d80db/d80db8ab3c5306c727bb9de53106bc538abd54d8" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM1 and TG-310 is 89 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce137/ce137d75db4a501031fc3309eb47abf40427b577" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing just by going through technical specs. The photograph here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM1 and TG-310.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PM1 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-310 will show extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The newer E-PM1 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9219b/9219b056a2d5aa34fefcc3c6f3a56d39b06e0ebc" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57ce7/57ce7d0263e98eb221f08ea2cd5182c170dc4171" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Olympus TG-310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Olympus TG-310 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2011-11-23 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 265g (0.58 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 150 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $499 | $0 |