Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced November 2011
- Successor is Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus E-PM1 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-PM1 (12MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-PM1 was released 13 months prior to the TG-830 iHS making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-PM1 grades against the TG-830 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM1 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM1 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-PM1 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-PM1
TG-830 iHS | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | November 2011 | Fresher by 13 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-PM1 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM1 enjoys outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PM1 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PM1 compared to the TG-830 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM1 and TG-830 iHS is 89 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM1 and TG-830 iHS.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PM1 because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-PM1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2011-11-23 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 265g (0.58 lbs) | 214g (0.47 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 300 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $499 | $0 |