Clicky

Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110

Portability
89
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49
Olympus PEN E-PM1 front
 
Olympus VG-110 front
Portability
97
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs

Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Launched November 2011
  • New Model is Olympus E-PM2
Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Announced February 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PM1 (12MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is very comparable but the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and VG-110 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-PM1 was unveiled 10 months later than the VG-110 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-PM1 scores vs the VG-110 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Olympus VG-110

 E-PM1 VG-110 
AnnouncedNovember 2011February 2011More recent by 10 months
Focus manually More exact focus
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus E-PM1

 VG-110 E-PM1 

Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Olympus VG-110

 E-PM1 VG-110 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM1 features external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-110 has dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PM1 vs the VG-110.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM1 and VG-110 is 89 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by going through specs. The visual below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM1 and VG-110.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras have the same resolution but different sensor measurements. The E-PM1 has the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The fresher E-PM1 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Portrait photography features
Olympus VG-110 Portrait photography features
60
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12MP)
26
comes with face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Street photography advice
Olympus VG-110 Street photography advice
75
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
48
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Sports photography information
Olympus VG-110 Sports photography information
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
max frames per second very slow (6.0 frames per second)
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not have phase detect autofocus
24
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery (170 per charge)
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Travel photography factors
Olympus VG-110 Travel photography factors
45
lack of Timelapse function
low MP (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
57
built-in flash
rather wide (27mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
not so great battery (170 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Landscape photography advice
Olympus VG-110 Landscape photography advice
65
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12MP)
lack of Timelapse function
27
rather wide (27mm)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
not so great battery (170 shots)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Vlogging features
Olympus VG-110 Vlogging features
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone port
28
rather wide (27mm)
comes with face detection focusing
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM1 and Olympus VG-110
 Olympus PEN E-PM1Olympus VG-110
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus PEN E-PM1 Olympus VG-110
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Launched 2011-11-23 2011-02-08
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VI TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 12800 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 27-108mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 6.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/160s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format AVCHD, Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 265 grams (0.58 pounds) 105 grams (0.23 pounds)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 52 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 499 not tested
Other
Battery life 330 images 170 images
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-5 LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $499 $150