Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched November 2011
- New Model is Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Announced February 2011
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PM1 (12MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is very comparable but the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and VG-110 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-PM1 was unveiled 10 months later than the VG-110 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-PM1 scores vs the VG-110 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM1 and Olympus VG-110. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PM1 Gallery and Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Olympus VG-110
E-PM1 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2011 | February 2011 | More recent by 10 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus E-PM1
VG-110 | E-PM1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Olympus VG-110
E-PM1 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM1 features external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-110 has dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PM1 vs the VG-110.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM1 and VG-110 is 89 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by going through specs. The visual below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM1 and VG-110.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have the same resolution but different sensor measurements. The E-PM1 has the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The fresher E-PM1 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM1 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Olympus VG-110 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-11-23 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 265 grams (0.58 pounds) | 105 grams (0.23 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 170 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $499 | $150 |