Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS200
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched November 2011
- Replacement is Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-PM1 and Panasonic ZS200, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-PM1 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") feature different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-PM1 was released 7 years prior to the ZS200 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-PM1 matches up against the ZS200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM1 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM1 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-PM1 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-PM1
ZS200 | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | November 2011 | Fresher by 75 months | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 460k | Sharper display (+780k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Panasonic ZS200
E-PM1 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM1 features external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PM1 and Panasonic ZS200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PM1 versus the ZS200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM1 and ZS200 is 89 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM1 and ZS200.
As you can see, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PM1 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older E-PM1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-11-23 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 265 gr (0.58 lbs) | 340 gr (0.75 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 370 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $499 | $800 |