Clicky

Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS35

Portability
89
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49
Olympus PEN E-PM1 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front
Portability
89
Imaging
40
Features
50
Overall
44

Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs

Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Launched November 2011
  • Successor is Olympus E-PM2
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
  • Launched January 2014
  • Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
  • Succeeded the Panasonic ZS30
  • Updated by Panasonic ZS40
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview

Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-PM1 and Panasonic ZS35, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PM1 (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-PM1 was revealed 3 years prior to the ZS35 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.

Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-PM1 grades vs the ZS35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Panasonic ZS35

 E-PM1 ZS35 
Manually focus More precise focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-PM1

 ZS35 E-PM1 
LaunchedJanuary 2014November 2011More recent by 25 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Panasonic ZS35

 E-PM1 ZS35 
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Display resolution460k460kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM1 enjoys outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has specifications of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-PM1 and Panasonic ZS35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PM1 vs the ZS35.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM1 and ZS35 is 89 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The photograph below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM1 and ZS35.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PM1 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZS35 will result in extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older E-PM1 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Portrait photography camera
60
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (12MP)
37
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Street photography info
Panasonic ZS35 Street photography info
75
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
68
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (305g)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Sports photography camera
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12MP)
no phase detect auto focus
53
long zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Travel photography camera
45
missing Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
68
lighter than competition in class (305g)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (480mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic ZS35 Landscape photography factors
65
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (12MP)
missing Time Lapse mode
44
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-PM1
Vlogging with Panasonic ZS35
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
missing mic socket
34
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (305g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
does not have mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PM1 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM1 and Panasonic ZS35
 Olympus PEN E-PM1Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus PEN E-PM1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
Alternative name - Lumix DMC-TZ55
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2011-11-23 2014-01-06
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VI -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 12800 3200
Highest boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 35 21
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-480mm (20.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 6.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 6.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/160s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format AVCHD, Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 265 gr (0.58 pounds) 305 gr (0.67 pounds)
Dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 52 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 499 not tested
Other
Battery life 330 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $499 $300