Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dc20/6dc204eefb71a9ef5bae01d9c451d4e7b9454420" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM1 front Olympus PEN E-PM1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94ff5/94ff5a51162be558964f8f43fe832dff1cbdccd0" alt="Pentax K200D front Pentax K200D front"
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched November 2011
- Updated by Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Introduced September 2008
- Succeeded the Pentax K100D S
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-PM1 versus Pentax K200D, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-PM1 (12MP) and the K200D (10MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and K200D (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PM1 was introduced 3 years after the K200D which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-PM1 grades against the K200D with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM1 and Pentax K200D. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM1 Gallery and Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Pentax K200D
E-PM1 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2011 | ![]() | September 2008 | Newer by 40 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus E-PM1
K200D | E-PM1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Pentax K200D
E-PM1 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM1 comes with outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) and the Pentax K200D has measurements of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") having a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PM1 versus Pentax K200D in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PM1 against the K200D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e95e/7e95e0a641a6c4e333c00aafe09cadc372e91d7a" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D size comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM1 and K200D is 89 and 61 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2e73/a2e73b29e55b80fd454e3d77e52dda8589a3ac8c" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by going through specifications. The image here should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM1 and K200D.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM1 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus E-PM1 will show greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-PM1 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48638/48638bda908bd1c145979502cd52dcfc25bd23bc" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8221a/8221af7b1774b41a2840e6a8c26fd253246dc272" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Pentax K200D |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2011-11-23 | 2008-09-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 265 gr (0.58 pounds) | 690 gr (1.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | 499 | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $499 | $600 |