Clicky

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GR III

Portability
89
Imaging
47
Features
52
Overall
49
Olympus PEN E-PM1 front
 
Ricoh GR III front
Portability
90
Imaging
68
Features
62
Overall
65

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs

Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Launched November 2011
  • Later Model is Olympus E-PM2
Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2018
  • Earlier Model is Ricoh GR III
  • New Model is Ricoh GR III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GR III Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-PM1 versus Ricoh GR III, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-PM1 (12MP) and GR III (24MP) and the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and GR III (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-PM1 was brought out 7 years before the GR III and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-PM1 scores versus the GR III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Ricoh GR III

 E-PM1 GR III 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus E-PM1

 GR III E-PM1 
LaunchedSeptember 2018November 2011More recent by 83 months
Screen resolution1037k460kSharper screen (+577k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Ricoh GR III

 E-PM1 GR III 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM1 enjoys outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) while the Ricoh GR III has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-PM1 versus Ricoh GR III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-PM1 against the GR III.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GR III size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM1 and GR III is 89 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The visual underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM1 and GR III.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PM1 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Ricoh GR III will provide you with greater detail having its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-PM1 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Portrait photography info
Ricoh GR III Portrait photography info
60
you can focus manually
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
supports RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
80
manual focus
decent megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
provides face detection focus
saves RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Street photography advice
Ricoh GR III Street photography advice
75
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
84
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
has touch to focus
lighter than competition (257 grams)
good ISO range (102,400)
screen does not articulate
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-PM1
Sports photography with Ricoh GR III
48
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
slow frames per second (6.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12MP)
lack of phase detect auto focus
75
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
has phase detect auto focus
can't change focal length (28mm)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-PM1
Travel photography with Ricoh GR III
45
does not have Time Lapse function
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
69
lighter than competition (257 grams)
has touch to focus
decent megapixels (24MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Landscape photography details
Ricoh GR III Landscape photography details
65
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse function
69
manual focus
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
no low pass filter
good ISO range (102,400)
saves RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-PM1
Vlogging with Ricoh GR III
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not feature selfie friendly display
does not have external mic jack
37
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (257g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PM1 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM1 and Ricoh GR III
 Olympus PEN E-PM1Ricoh GR III
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus PEN E-PM1 Ricoh GR III
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-11-23 2018-09-25
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VI -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4032 x 3024 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 12800 102400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-16
Macro focus distance - 6cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 460k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 6.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/160 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format AVCHD, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 265g (0.58 lb) 257g (0.57 lb)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 52 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 499 not tested
Other
Battery life 330 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $499 $900