Clicky

Olympus E-PM1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2

Portability
89
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49
Olympus PEN E-PM1 front
 
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
60
Overall
48

Olympus E-PM1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Key Specs

Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Announced November 2011
  • New Model is Olympus E-PM2
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 4.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 283g - 133 x 71 x 19mm
  • Released January 2014
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-PM1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Overview

Below is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-PM1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PM1 (12MP) and Galaxy Camera 2 (16MP) and the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and Galaxy Camera 2 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-PM1 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the Galaxy Camera 2 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-PM1 scores versus the Galaxy Camera 2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2

 E-PM1 Galaxy Camera 2 

Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 over the Olympus E-PM1

 Galaxy Camera 2 E-PM1 
ReleasedJanuary 2014November 2011More recent by 25 months
Display size4.8"3"Larger display (+1.8")
Display resolution1037k460kClearer display (+577k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2

 E-PM1 Galaxy Camera 2 
Focus manually More exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-PM1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM1 provides outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 has dimensions of 133mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 283 grams (0.62 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-PM1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PM1 vs the Galaxy Camera 2.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM1 and Galaxy Camera 2 is 89 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The graphic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM1 and Galaxy Camera 2.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PM1 with its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 will resolve extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The older E-PM1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-PM1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Portrait photography advice
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Portrait photography advice
60
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
44
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detect focus
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Street photography advice
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Street photography advice
75
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
65
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports focus via touch
lighter than competitors (283g)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-PM1
Sports photography with Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (6.0 frames per second)
low MP (12MP)
has no phase detect AF
48
long zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
great battery power (400 shots)
max frames per second very slow (5.0 frames per second)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Travel photography info
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Travel photography info
45
does not have Timelapse mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
73
great battery power (400 CIPA)
lighter than competitors (283 grams)
has bluetooth
supports focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 Landscape photography details
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Landscape photography details
65
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse mode
52
you can focus manually
pretty wide (23mm)
big screen (4.8 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
great battery power (400 shots)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM1 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 as a Vlogging camera
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
does not have external microphone jack
37
pretty wide (23mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
comes with microphone support
lighter than competitors (283g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-PM1 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM1 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
 Olympus PEN E-PM1Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus PEN E-PM1 Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2011-11-23 2014-01-02
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VI 1.6GHz Quad-Core Exynos
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 35 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 4.8 inches
Screen resolution 460k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating HD Super Clear Touch Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 6.0 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill-in, slow sync, flash off, redeye fix
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/160 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format AVCHD, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 265 grams (0.58 lb) 283 grams (0.62 lb)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 133 x 71 x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 52 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 499 not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photos 400 photos
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-5 Built-in
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 5, or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Card slots One One
Launch cost $499 $400