Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma fp
89 Imaging
47 Features
52 Overall
49
84 Imaging
74 Features
79 Overall
76
Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched November 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Introduced July 2019
- Renewed by Sigma fp L
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma fp Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-PM1 versus Sigma fp, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-PM1 (12MP) and fp (25MP) and the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and fp (Full frame) provide totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-PM1 was introduced 8 years earlier than the fp and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-PM1 matches up versus the fp in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma fp Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM1 and Sigma fp. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PM1 Gallery and Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Sigma fp
| E-PM1 | fp |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Olympus E-PM1
| fp | E-PM1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2019 | November 2011 | More recent by 92 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 2100k | 460k | Sharper screen (+1640k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Sigma fp
| E-PM1 | fp | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM1 offers exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) and the Sigma fp has specifications of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PM1 versus Sigma fp in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PM1 and the fp.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM1 and fp is 89 and 84 respectively.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM1 and fp.
As you can tell, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PM1 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Sigma fp will provide more detail using its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-PM1 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-PM1 vs Sigma fp Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Sigma fp | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Sigma fp |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2011-11-23 | 2019-07-11 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 858.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 25MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 6 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Leica L |
| Total lenses | 107 | 30 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 2,100k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/160s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | No |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 265 grams (0.58 pounds) | 422 grams (0.93 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 52 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $499 | $2,050 |