Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dc20/6dc204eefb71a9ef5bae01d9c451d4e7b9454420" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM1 front Olympus PEN E-PM1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc9a0/cc9a0ca2125609e674d299e5b8108d0775ff4eee" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed November 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced July 2010
- Earlier Model is Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-PM1 and Sony A390, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-PM1 (12MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PM1 (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PM1 was launched 17 months later than the A390 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-PM1 matches up versus the A390 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM1 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PM1 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Sony A390
E-PM1 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2011 | ![]() | July 2010 | More recent by 17 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-PM1
A390 | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM1 and Sony A390
E-PM1 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM1 provides exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs) while the Sony A390 has sizing of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PM1 and Sony A390 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-PM1 and the A390.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ea5d/4ea5da2f675783bc4bbe1538bda1a92bb86cb96f" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 size comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM1 and A390 is 89 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28f26/28f264b0cb29195637e4e6386c604b15ca8da2bc" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements just by seeing specifications. The visual here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM1 and A390.
To sum up, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PM1 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony A390 will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger E-PM1 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e71/86e71a9a46fadcd314b59219e36d4af005bee795" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2b9c/c2b9c4a1d8f7e44f75f845dffd3b4bde12d02c78" alt="Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM1 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2011-11-23 | 2010-07-28 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 265g (0.58 pounds) | 549g (1.21 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | 499 | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 230 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $499 | $500 |