Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus SP-565UZ, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-PM2 was unveiled 4 years after the SP-565UZ which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-PM2 scores against the SP-565UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-PM2 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 53 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-PM2
SP-565UZ | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-PM2 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM2 features external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has proportions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PM2 vs the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4c14/b4c147d5e9b27e02bcb8e631872782ce6f459ca1" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and SP-565UZ is 89 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69e70/69e704d71a17410ae6e665fba171e1c8321069d7" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading specs. The pic below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and SP-565UZ.
All in all, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will offer you extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-PM2 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7345/f7345ee0a0bbd1d94efa866e9fd378b8aa066567" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0662/d0662dcec4c47081a33f5b81328a056347b3f3a3" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-05-21 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $448 | $400 |