Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Superseded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Replacement is Olympus SP-610UZ
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-PM2 was released 3 years later than the SP-600 UZ and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the SP-600 UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus SP-600 UZ. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-PM2 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2013 | February 2010 | Fresher by 41 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Olympus E-PM2
SP-600 UZ | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-PM2 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM2 offers exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus SP-600 UZ has proportions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PM2 vs the SP-600 UZ.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and SP-600 UZ is 89 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading through specs. The photograph here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM2 and SP-600 UZ.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-PM2 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-05-21 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lb) | 455 gr (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $448 | $189 |