Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-15
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
88 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Launched June 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-15 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus SZ-15, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the SZ-15 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and SZ-15 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PM2 was manufactured about the same time to the SZ-15 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-15 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the SZ-15 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-15 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus SZ-15. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus SZ-15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus SZ-15
| E-PM2 | SZ-15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-15 over the Olympus E-PM2
| SZ-15 | E-PM2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus SZ-15
| E-PM2 | SZ-15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2013 |  | June 2013 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-15 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM2 has got exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-15 has dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus SZ-15 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-PM2 compared to the SZ-15.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and SZ-15 is 89 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-15 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The image below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM2 and SZ-15.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer the same exact megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 has got the larger sensor which should make getting bokeh simpler.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-15 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SZ-15 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus SZ-15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus SZ-15 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2013-06-21 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | AVI MPEG4, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lb) | 250 grams (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $448 | $200 |