Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/203d6/203d6db6766362b5dbe876a4a09bc638bfbe2ebf" alt="Olympus Stylus 550WP front Olympus Stylus 550WP front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Also Known as mju 550WP
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus 550WP, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and 550WP (10MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and 550WP (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-PM2 was brought out 4 years later than the 550WP and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 550WP being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-PM2 matches up versus the 550WP with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus Stylus 550WP. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus 550WP Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus 550WP
E-PM2 | 550WP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 54 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Olympus E-PM2
550WP | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus 550WP
E-PM2 | 550WP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 offers outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus 550WP has measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus 550WP in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PM2 versus the 550WP.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/258f7/258f7e6c5374efe1e1f788681b9f7ea0e7531bfa" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and 550WP is 89 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be14c/be14ca60f2e511d8314dad344eab6b0a21f3bf59" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements merely by looking at technical specs. The photograph here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and 550WP.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PM2 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will give more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-PM2 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d8ef/1d8ef03c1978f5ca823dd41c4a5e0375d82bb0c2" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9386/d93863e078b4e033f45cb1c27075506338ba579c" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 550WP Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Stylus 550WP | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
Otherwise known as | - | mju 550WP |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2009-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.0 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 7cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $448 | $399 |