Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a364/2a3647a98ab0bb484e2e78927db40e2edfac5dc0" alt="Olympus Stylus SP-100 front Olympus Stylus SP-100 front"
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 594g - 122 x 91 x 133mm
- Launched January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus SP-100, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the SP-100 (16MP) is fairly comparable but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and SP-100 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PM2 was launched 8 months earlier than the SP-100 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-100 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the SP-100 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus Stylus SP-100. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus SP-100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus SP-100
E-PM2 | SP-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-100 over the Olympus E-PM2
SP-100 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | May 2013 | More modern by 8 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus SP-100
E-PM2 | SP-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 enjoys external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Olympus SP-100 has sizing of 122mm x 91mm x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") having a weight of 594 grams (1.31 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus SP-100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PM2 vs the SP-100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0afff/0afff31c042df9505592cf8660bcc3c5e326e7d5" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and SP-100 is 89 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aad30/aad300644d3adecb8459346ae0a7fc753e2f1680" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing a spec sheet. The image underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and SP-100.
As you can see, each of these cameras provide the same resolution but different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 includes the larger sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field easier. The more aged E-PM2 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c55f7/c55f7804528f33f194697e8dace707316a1ca484" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4500a/4500a571fcbc5431ba6699af05b1757235317969" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus SP-100 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Stylus SP-100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Stylus SP-100 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-05-21 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 920k dot |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1700 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Fill-in, Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Optional |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lb) | 594 gr (1.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 122 x 91 x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 330 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $448 | $400 |