Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3be10/3be1075d35d6ec5ee027d640297ca7ce28c3fabb" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 6010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus 6010, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and 6010 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and 6010 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-PM2 was released 3 years later than the 6010 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6010 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-PM2 grades vs the 6010 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6010. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Olympus 6010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus 6010
E-PM2 | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 47 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Olympus E-PM2
6010 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus 6010
E-PM2 | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 enjoys outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6010 has specifications of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus 6010 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PM2 against the 6010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20136/201369560f689d5fa7069ae47a323115fa4f1080" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and 6010 is 89 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6bbb/c6bbb6f2fec245bd91b0fb5781f27c0ac9137686" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing specs. The photograph here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM2 and 6010.
All in all, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PM2 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-PM2 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5adc9/5adc9feed36c7756bc644ec472649ab67e10d950" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e96fa/e96fa235adf95836b4024f9def53645fee940aac" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 6010 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 |
Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 6010 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2013-05-21 | 2009-07-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 179 grams (0.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-50C |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $448 | $0 |