Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and 8000 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and 8000 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PM2 was introduced 3 years later than the 8000 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the 8000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus 8000
E-PM2 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 48 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus E-PM2
8000 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus 8000
E-PM2 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 has outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8000 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-PM2 versus the 8000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/693fd/693fd9b46c2223c2da205bb677025931ed46291d" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and 8000 is 89 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68ae8/68ae8dce2fcea5298873636b0cc5c69df4f62350" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and 8000.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will produce extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher E-PM2 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48683/486834f64dab47af7e77888d4142160c112097ae" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d33c/3d33cfda6430561d887192d3cbe7083addceba6a" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 8000 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-05-21 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 pounds) | 182g (0.40 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $448 | $380 |