Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched February 2015
- Replacement is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus TG-860, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is pretty close but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-PM2 was launched 20 months before the TG-860 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-PM2 matches up against the TG-860 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus TG-860
E-PM2 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-PM2
TG-860 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | May 2013 | More modern by 20 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-860
E-PM2 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 has exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus TG-860 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PM2 against the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45a03/45a03f2dddc10d6f1cacb3c4847597009f567406" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and TG-860 is 89 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c138/4c138f78e76f3fa662638ba1d6bbb3f905e23daf" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and TG-860.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-PM2 comes with the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The more aged E-PM2 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf32b/cf32bfad83344c28ce38ec24d67770f24732d294" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b318/1b318aeb2c0c6d47fefaf28d5930ea8682fcf8a5" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2013-05-21 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) | 224 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 300 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $448 | $279 |