Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Old Model is Olympus TG-860
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-870, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the TG-870 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-PM2 was brought out 3 years before the TG-870 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-PM2 matches up versus the TG-870 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus TG-870
E-PM2 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-PM2
TG-870 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | ![]() | May 2013 | More modern by 32 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-870
E-PM2 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 has exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has sizing of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-870 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PM2 against the TG-870.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1e71/f1e717b5a5a1b4e6453ee777e02bf7ec1caa3a88" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and TG-870 is 89 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5c53/d5c5333a04983d1b8e33774680cbbf9c391fd6d6" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking specs. The image underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and TG-870.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 features the bigger sensor which should make achieving bokeh simpler. The more aged E-PM2 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e4eb/6e4eb528335b2238d155582429d9e13acabcbed4" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cb61/1cb6198513a3af076b0262947238586cd41244bb" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2013-05-21 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lb) | 221 grams (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 300 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $448 | $280 |