Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PM2 was brought out 16 months after the TG-820 iHS making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-PM2 grades versus the TG-820 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-PM2 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | February 2012 | More modern by 16 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-PM2
TG-820 iHS | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1030k | 460k | Clearer display (+570k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-PM2 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 comes with physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PM2 vs the TG-820 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and TG-820 iHS is 89 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The image below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will provide you with more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher E-PM2 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 220 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $448 | $500 |