Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-PM2 was revealed 13 months after the TG-1 iHS making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-PM2 scores vs the TG-1 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-PM2 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2013 | May 2012 | More modern by 13 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-PM2
TG-1 iHS | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 610k | 460k | Clearer display (+150k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-PM2 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 comes with physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PM2 and the TG-1 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and TG-1 iHS is 89 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The image here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM2 and TG-1 iHS.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will give more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The newer E-PM2 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 350 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $448 | $399 |