Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PM2 was launched very close to the TG-2 iHS and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-PM2 matches up versus the TG-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-PM2 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-PM2
TG-2 iHS | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+150k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-PM2 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | ![]() | June 2013 | Similar age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM2 features outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-PM2 compared to the TG-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9ed4/b9ed4b2c2c6b8cfba499d7d03e01c79c24d0d78f" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and TG-2 iHS is 89 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64d77/64d77f10c4afcb5450d59024c3b9c02a39fa16ec" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and TG-2 iHS.
To sum up, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PM2 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49458/49458f742250dd9903e1d579a75c438273fd012a" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fb5d/4fb5df9e9a12b61e6b5276cf0d0e25e224f242e2" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2013-06-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $448 | $380 |