Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus TG-4, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PM2 was unveiled 23 months prior to the TG-4 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the TG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus TG-4
E-PM2 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-PM2
TG-4 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2015 | ![]() | May 2013 | More recent by 23 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus TG-4
E-PM2 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM2 provides physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus TG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-PM2 versus the TG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b39c/3b39cabcc0538a499f313e85c0098908c6c282c0" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and TG-4 is 89 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/030f8/030f8a8df9d20c2ca8bc476496d701b2f280a393" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specs. The graphic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and TG-4.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses the exact same megapixels but not the same sensor measurements. The E-PM2 includes the larger sensor which will make getting shallower DOF easier. The older E-PM2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/797a9/797a94987bb57d708a9f2a3971d2f8d5b554b61d" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/983a0/983a07604a7db65bef8df77ac4d4028acb362208" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-05-21 | 2015-04-13 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 380 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $448 | $379 |