Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus VG-160, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-PM2 was released 17 months later than the VG-160 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-PM2 matches up versus the VG-160 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus VG-160
E-PM2 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 17 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-PM2
VG-160 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus VG-160
E-PM2 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 provides outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus VG-160 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-PM2 and the VG-160.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d607/3d607699239a034f06254fa9660d7b5a3c673e10" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and VG-160 is 89 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40147/40147f082302be9d32733b83de391b4313c5a461" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at specs. The graphic below should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and VG-160.
All in all, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PM2 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer E-PM2 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d85fd/d85fdbb78371be4eb23fb419718bef74abd6b43b" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61197/61197c19b39fb354d382d3f3b200d3940e52caeb" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus VG-160 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-05-21 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 7cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 165 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $448 | $90 |