Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59f27/59f2779b461c5c1f48d75ee4336ab725697c7831" alt="Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus VH-410, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the VH-410 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and VH-410 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PM2 was launched 10 months later than the VH-410 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-PM2 grades versus the VH-410 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Olympus VH-410. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus VH-410
E-PM2 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | ![]() | August 2012 | More recent by 10 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus E-PM2
VH-410 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus VH-410
E-PM2 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 enjoys outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-410 has sizing of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PM2 versus Olympus VH-410 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-PM2 compared to the VH-410.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1071a/1071a8b6fb74979105b597a2e5d06deac41c6a2a" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and VH-410 is 89 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23a8a/23a8a37ac8d31f5d97f2e9cd9005621d59af62f3" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at specs. The visual below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and VH-410.
All in all, both the cameras offer the same exact megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The E-PM2 features the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field less difficult. The more modern E-PM2 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf4cc/bf4cc2af9b59861c5117467e75e94fb48281e145" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49a47/49a4709262c0d214f86f01a01b43be7dadb50649" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus VH-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus VH-410 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lb) | 152 grams (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $448 | $186 |