Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is very similar but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and VR-340 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PM2 was manufactured 17 months after the VR-340 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-PM2 grades versus the VR-340 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Olympus VR-340. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus VR-340
E-PM2 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 17 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus E-PM2
VR-340 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus VR-340
E-PM2 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 offers outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-PM2 versus the VR-340.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d576/0d576bde5d128eadd2810e6c65c6be2e1206279e" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and VR-340 is 89 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71004/710048e5c685f0095f396332fbc8911654d13032" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specs. The pic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and VR-340.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses the exact same MP but not the same sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 offers the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field less difficult. The more recent E-PM2 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cc3/66cc37294333d992b6d0ed093074f95d8601b0d4" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ff7c/8ff7ce1910ee32ec1fef8dba2579c83b4946a18c" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus VR-340 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-05-21 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-5.7 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $448 | $130 |