Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are sold by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PM2 was announced 6 months after the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the E-PM2 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-PM2 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-PM2
XZ-2 iHS | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-PM2 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2013 | ![]() | December 2012 | Similar age |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM2 enjoys external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PM2 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PM2 vs the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efee7/efee7c55b652714dbdc015ac5437c654a0e5eef5" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and XZ-2 iHS is 89 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9de3/f9de3fafc661915b9ebe9f0efa53f43bbcfb7981" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specs. The pic here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will offer extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f928/0f928075b9aca4e34f289cfe8d1ca230599326e9" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fba40/fba40ad1e2801e928a9e688e090faa877212ffe4" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-05-21 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | 932 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | 340 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $448 | $450 |