Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee971/ee97147179d1c3cc1d6b160f5f8c90a034b8f19f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R front Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R front"
54 Imaging
79 Features
84 Overall
81
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 1020g - 149 x 110 x 97mm
- Launched February 2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and S1R (47MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and S1R (Full frame) boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-PM2 was released 6 years prior to the S1R which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic S1R being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-PM2 scores versus the S1R with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Panasonic S1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic S1R
E-PM2 | S1R |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic S1R over the Olympus E-PM2
S1R | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2019 | ![]() | May 2013 | Newer by 69 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+1640k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic S1R
E-PM2 | S1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 offers outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Panasonic S1R has measurements of 149mm x 110mm x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") and a weight of 1020 grams (2.25 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PM2 and the S1R.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7040/d70406b24235d4a6cf9b7b75953226eb6ac637ed" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and S1R is 89 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91784/917843526bcd48725dc1cf986c8585cbf9338581" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking specs. The pic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and S1R.
All in all, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Panasonic S1R will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 31 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-PM2 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2212/a22129458dff8c5d8de4e1553b974e05a9af9814" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/751d9/751d952b134ceb69e09e3bd886080cc4df0529f8" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic S1R Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2019-02-01 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 47 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 8000 x 6000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Leica L |
Number of lenses | 107 | 30 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.2" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 2,100k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 5,760k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync w/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/320 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes (can be charged with high-power laptop/tablet chargers or portable power banks) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 lbs) | 1020g (2.25 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 149 x 110 x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | 100 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 26.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | 14.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | 3525 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 360 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Dual |
Cost at launch | $448 | $3,698 |