Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74ffb/74ffb1851885b9e3957d5f8590417174f0eb5bfe" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 163g - 98 x 55 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FH1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and FH1 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and FH1 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PM2 was launched 3 years later than the FH1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH1 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-PM2 scores vs the FH1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Panasonic FH1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic FH1
E-PM2 | FH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 42 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH1 over the Olympus E-PM2
FH1 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FH1
E-PM2 | FH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM2 has outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Panasonic FH1 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FH1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PM2 vs the FH1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f8bc/3f8bcb96f4a2016e653af53c0f50c99fad8d4216" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and FH1 is 89 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebd97/ebd97d465c27a7268c688829f335475ab00c4fd6" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The photograph below will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and FH1.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will give greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The newer E-PM2 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dac3c/dac3c556c3851b9b64672b214e9e1da349d53117" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1f61/f1f61d37814805942b49ed75d40494c5dc1c41d3" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS10 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-05-21 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 6.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) | 163 grams (0.36 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 98 x 55 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $448 | $150 |