Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01cfb/01cfb16fa3bcc5f18c56977b2d65dfba44843708" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH10 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH10 front"
97 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 103g - 94 x 54 x 18mm
- Launched January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-PM2 versus Panasonic FH10, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the FH10 (16MP) is relatively comparable but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and FH10 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-PM2 was manufactured 5 months after the FH10 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH10 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-PM2 grades vs the FH10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH10. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Panasonic FH10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic FH10
E-PM2 | FH10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH10 over the Olympus E-PM2
FH10 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FH10
E-PM2 | FH10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | Same age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM2 features external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Panasonic FH10 has dimensions of 94mm x 54mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 103 grams (0.23 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PM2 versus Panasonic FH10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PM2 and the FH10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfcc8/dfcc838b8945db8dc6879eaa68b15b5f37ebffb8" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and FH10 is 89 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c695d/c695df46b9394f7d0e24d162fad3d41a57802629" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The pic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and FH10.
Clearly, the two cameras offer the same exact megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-PM2 offers the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ca86/7ca8628341f70a44b298718d2158175d3acc4cca" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43ccd/43ccd8dc73ed6add81e8e060a2b3bdf86657bb93" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FH10 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH10 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-05-21 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lb) | 103 gr (0.23 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 94 x 54 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 260 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $448 | $110 |