Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a37a7/a37a7bfaeed321f20fbd53c45a152de64dffd65c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and FP1 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and FP1 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-PM2 was unveiled 3 years after the FP1 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-PM2 scores versus the FP1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Panasonic FP1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic FP1
E-PM2 | FP1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 42 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP1 over the Olympus E-PM2
FP1 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FP1
E-PM2 | FP1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM2 offers outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Panasonic FP1 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-PM2 and the FP1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9ef6/f9ef61b0107b981bdb1c1bf9e03ed72610a09bb3" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and FP1 is 89 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0eea3/0eea301d47249374d5745ff96be182075352b0dc" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specs. The picture underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and FP1.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will give you extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent E-PM2 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79b75/79b758c2938c90c4f7e09eb7fa4c8e663a6dae03" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd672/cd672d57cb12c33ceb1ec22dfd2d072e6b9d6bc4" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FP1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2013-05-21 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 lbs) | 151g (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $448 | $153 |