Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97595/97595091e04b873f01a3fddd6303aaf9df4a4ff6" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Launched January 2011
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FX78, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and FX78 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and FX78 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PM2 was introduced 2 years later than the FX78 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the FX78 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic FX78
E-PM2 | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 29 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus E-PM2
FX78 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FX78
E-PM2 | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 features outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Panasonic FX78 has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FX78 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PM2 compared to the FX78.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cc44/8cc447ee26d23a361be0e0ef2d8d4601266fa8b4" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and FX78 is 89 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1af79/1af7995ba21cd642e01257f2499924c6bfd166e2" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The photograph below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and FX78.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PM2 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer E-PM2 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aecfd/aecfdf0df2bbc059a14868063d61c68f37f2d84f" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08ca7/08ca7a9dc69a34b0aafe8f3144934237236e92c2" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2011-01-25 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 lbs) | 142g (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 200 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $448 | $210 |