Clicky

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78

Portability
89
Imaging
53
Features
63
Overall
57
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
31
Overall
33

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs

Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Launched May 2013
  • Replaced the Olympus E-PM1
Panasonic FX78
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
  • 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2011
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview

Below is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FX78, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and FX78 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and FX78 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-PM2 was introduced 2 years later than the FX78 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the FX78 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic FX78

 E-PM2 FX78 
LaunchedMay 2013January 2011More recent by 29 months
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus E-PM2

 FX78 E-PM2 
Screen size3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FX78

 E-PM2 FX78 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 features outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Panasonic FX78 has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FX78 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PM2 compared to the FX78.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and FX78 is 89 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The photograph below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and FX78.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PM2 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer E-PM2 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Portrait photography details
Panasonic FX78 Portrait photography details
71
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
21
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Street photography details
Panasonic FX78 Street photography details
79
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
features touch to focus
above average high ISO (25,600)
screen is fixed
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-PM2
Sports photography with Panasonic FX78
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
no phase detect autofocus
28
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (200 CIPA)
lacks phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Travel photography features
Panasonic FX78 Travel photography features
66
features touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
doesn't have Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
56
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse function
not so great battery power (200 shots)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Landscape photography information
Panasonic FX78 Landscape photography information
74
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
36
pretty wide (24mm)
big screen (3.5 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.5)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
not so great battery power (200 shots)
lack of Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FX78 as a Vlogging camera
36
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone socket
33
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FX78
 Olympus PEN E-PM2Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus PEN E-PM2 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
Alternative name - Lumix DMC-FX77
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2013-05-21 2011-01-25
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 35 11
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.5-5.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3.5 inch
Screen resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames per sec 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) 5.60 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 269g (0.59 lbs) 142g (0.31 lbs)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 932 not tested
Other
Battery life 360 photographs 200 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $448 $210