Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc5a2/dc5a23e639490cb05b989f13eba4ea99bfc355d5" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 149g - 102 x 56 x 22mm
- Announced August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and FX90 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and FX90 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PM2 was launched 22 months after the FX90 making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX90 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-PM2 scores vs the FX90 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Panasonic FX90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic FX90
E-PM2 | FX90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2013 | ![]() | August 2011 | More modern by 22 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX90 over the Olympus E-PM2
FX90 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FX90
E-PM2 | FX90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 has exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX90 has specifications of 102mm x 56mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PM2 vs the FX90.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d277/1d277a38022e1c3d2469371ff345a3540939ba7b" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and FX90 is 89 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1070/a1070455f8e8416e1ec0e56f71e467e1189f9dbd" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading a spec sheet. The picture underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and FX90.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-PM2 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/196fa/196fabc7535ab9da1af500056b129667879fa94c" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2507/c250759fe1f9b52204827c996a2331533960b3a5" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FX90 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-05-21 | 2011-08-26 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 5.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) | 149 grams (0.33 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 56 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | 200 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $448 | $227 |