Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ1000
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Launched June 2014
- Renewed by Panasonic FZ2500
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ1000, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the FZ1000 (20MP) is very similar but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and FZ1000 (1") offer different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-PM2 was revealed 12 months earlier than the FZ1000 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-PM2 scores versus the FZ1000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic FZ1000
E-PM2 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus E-PM2
FZ1000 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2014 | May 2013 | Fresher by 12 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FZ1000
E-PM2 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 enjoys physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 has measurements of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") along with a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ1000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PM2 vs the FZ1000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and FZ1000 is 89 and 55 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and FZ1000.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FZ1000 will deliver more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The older E-PM2 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2014-06-12 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) | 831 grams (1.83 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 360 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $448 | $800 |