Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ300
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FZ200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-PM2 was released 11 months after the FZ200 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-PM2 scores vs the FZ200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic FZ200
E-PM2 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2013 | July 2012 | More modern by 11 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-PM2
FZ200 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FZ200
E-PM2 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | The same screen resolution |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 provides outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has specifications of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FZ200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PM2 against the FZ200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and FZ200 is 89 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The image below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and FZ200.
As you have seen, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern E-PM2 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-05-21 | 2012-07-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 13.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 pounds) | 588g (1.30 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | 37 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 540 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $448 | $499 |