Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14531/14531b22504a4959f06ffa69a9ec4d9107943879" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front"
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FZ200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PM2 was released 11 months after the FZ200 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-PM2 scores vs the FZ200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic FZ200
E-PM2 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2013 | ![]() | July 2012 | More modern by 11 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-PM2
FZ200 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FZ200
E-PM2 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same screen resolution |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 provides outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has specifications of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FZ200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PM2 against the FZ200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b72e/4b72e8e9591abc51d4aa080b8b63e3385fea38c1" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and FZ200 is 89 and 65 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94267/942678b357ab63abccf48277154237e458490c0f" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The image below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and FZ200.
As you have seen, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern E-PM2 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/597db/597dba786e6c8af3e5e145fb65ea8f5b1fa3ae5b" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44f62/44f62aa4a5dc3a1d51f378170ff20b52faf797d8" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-05-21 | 2012-07-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 13.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 pounds) | 588g (1.30 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | 37 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 540 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $448 | $499 |