Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e7/eb0e7d68430f7af24efc1c439232dbd28d053d73" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front"
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Released July 2015
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and FZ300 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PM2 was announced 3 years earlier than the FZ300 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the FZ300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic FZ300
E-PM2 | FZ300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-PM2
FZ300 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2015 | ![]() | May 2013 | More modern by 26 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FZ300
E-PM2 | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 offers outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ300 has measurements of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") along with a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-PM2 against the FZ300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed2ac/ed2ac050a31e423021a3e31dc6732bc9c96fcae7" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and FZ300 is 89 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3428d/3428de6ecb5aa554261d450afb78cb5bfd6be624" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and FZ300.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will give you more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-PM2 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07eef/07eef48c776845edf44949b6774667031cff5414" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aae67/aae67476a8549a890507ac7ee34d47b9c9711659" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2015-07-16 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) | 691 grams (1.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 380 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $448 | $598 |