Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/708ca/708ca63198576f0ffc46689e66eb690a812d18d4" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front"
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and FZ35 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-PM2 was brought out 2 years later than the FZ35 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the FZ35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic FZ35
E-PM2 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | More recent by 35 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-PM2
FZ35 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FZ35
E-PM2 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM2 has got outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ35 has dimensions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-PM2 against the FZ35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5a38/c5a384a644982ba5aff71ace6842a1c17205716a" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and FZ35 is 89 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbf7e/cbf7e618eb58cb0ba4bcd54eb0f44888bc0c733e" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and FZ35.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PM2 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will provide you with more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively. The more recent E-PM2 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46d93/46d93a030d2f1ee28d997394a0adbbee3db0b1bc" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/309a2/309a237fc8f77ecb0819513e1c3e4bfe559ce135" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 8.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 pounds) | 397g (0.88 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $448 | $999 |