Clicky

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35

Portability
89
Imaging
53
Features
63
Overall
57
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front
Portability
72
Imaging
35
Features
37
Overall
35

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs

Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Revealed May 2013
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-PM1
Panasonic FZ35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
  • 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
  • Launched July 2010
  • Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview

Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and FZ35 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-PM2 was brought out 2 years later than the FZ35 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the FZ35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic FZ35

 E-PM2 FZ35 
LaunchedMay 2013July 2010More recent by 35 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-PM2

 FZ35 E-PM2 

Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FZ35

 E-PM2 FZ35 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM2 has got outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ35 has dimensions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-PM2 against the FZ35.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and FZ35 is 89 and 72 respectively.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and FZ35.

As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PM2 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will provide you with more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively. The more recent E-PM2 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-PM2
Portrait photography with Panasonic FZ35
71
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
41
focusing manually
features face detect focusing
exports RAW files
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Street photography features
Panasonic FZ35 Street photography features
79
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
offers touch to focus
great ISO range (25,600)
no moving screen
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FZ35 as a Sports photography camera
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect autofocus
34
long zoom range (27-486mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow fps (2.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Travel photography factors
Panasonic FZ35 Travel photography factors
66
offers touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
no Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
52
flash built-in
quite wide (27mm)
great zoom (486mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Landscape photography info
Panasonic FZ35 Landscape photography info
74
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
41
focusing manually
quite wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Vlogging information
Panasonic FZ35 Vlogging information
36
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no external mic support
26
quite wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic FZ35
 Olympus PEN E-PM2Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus PEN E-PM2 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
Otherwise known as - Lumix DMC-FZ38
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2013-05-21 2010-07-06
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine V
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 27-486mm (18.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-4.4
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 8.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) 8.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 269g (0.59 pounds) 397g (0.88 pounds)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 932 not tested
Other
Battery life 360 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures))
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $448 $999