Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic GX1
89 Imaging
53 Features
63 Overall
57
87 Imaging
52 Features
54 Overall
52
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic GX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 318g - 116 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Later Model is Panasonic GX7
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic GX1 Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic GX1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the GX1 (16MP) is very similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-PM2 was brought out 16 months after the GX1 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-PM2 scores versus the GX1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic GX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Panasonic GX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic GX1
| E-PM2 | GX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2013 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX1 over the Olympus E-PM2
| GX1 | E-PM2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic GX1
| E-PM2 | GX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic GX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 has got physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Panasonic GX1 has sizing of 116mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 318 grams (0.70 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic GX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PM2 compared to the GX1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and GX1 is 89 and 87 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic GX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and GX1.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP so you can expect similar quality of images however you will need to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer E-PM2 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic GX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic GX1 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2012-02-14 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3448 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 160 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 7.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) | 318 gr (0.70 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 116 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 72 | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | 20.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | 10.6 |
| DXO Low light score | 932 | 703 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $448 | $228 |
