Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba3e8/ba3e852d8fd2ac4c9d856754d60968dffd538032" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 177g - 99 x 60 x 30mm
- Announced January 2015
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic SZ10, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the SZ10 (16MP) is fairly similar but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and SZ10 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PM2 was announced 19 months prior to the SZ10 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic SZ10 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-PM2 scores versus the SZ10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Panasonic SZ10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic SZ10
E-PM2 | SZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ10 over the Olympus E-PM2
SZ10 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2015 | ![]() | May 2013 | More recent by 19 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic SZ10
E-PM2 | SZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 has got outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Panasonic SZ10 has specifications of 99mm x 60mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic SZ10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PM2 against the SZ10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e029/6e029fa5b0b7764109bc8df199b36730ecd093bc" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and SZ10 is 89 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07f81/07f81e4318e1fee189f9e2046d0ed3744d7bf69c" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading specs. The graphic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM2 and SZ10.
All in all, both of those cameras have the same megapixels but not the same sensor measurements. The E-PM2 includes the larger sensor which should make getting bokeh easier. The older E-PM2 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50036/50036e846f5b9cad6fa4d418885f3b0f0d935d35" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60dc8/60dc8f1e8a4b79735e94a5dd04591232cfab70b7" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic SZ10 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-05-21 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 1.4 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, slow sync w/redeye, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p), 320 x 240 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 177 grams (0.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 99 x 60 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 200 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $448 | $200 |