Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43ffc/43ffc5718422e6e3eca344eb7e4a55ae79707d20" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 front"
93 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 189g - 98 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FT1
- Newer Model is Panasonic TS2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus E-PM2 versus Panasonic TS1, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and TS1 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and TS1 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PM2 was manufactured 4 years after the TS1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic TS1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-PM2 grades against the TS1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Panasonic TS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic TS1
E-PM2 | TS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 53 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS1 over the Olympus E-PM2
TS1 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic TS1
E-PM2 | TS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 has physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Panasonic TS1 has measurements of 98mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 189 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PM2 versus Panasonic TS1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PM2 vs the TS1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c314b/c314bddcb60d17b3903c8525ff27e565d41af54f" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and TS1 is 89 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba3a5/ba3a55cf9cb2bff2fa8a2df1303a3da6b27f52e3" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by checking out technical specs. The pic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and TS1.
As you can tell, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will produce extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-PM2 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2752/e2752af4a3f7bbf31ac4655e4d87a6636129fdbb" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9d66/d9d6672c909aa01b8f117ff73c8cbe6e1b049248" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic TS1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FT1 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-05-21 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 189 grams (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 98 x 63 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $448 | $380 |