Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3a83/a3a8345ec89b1fa7b1b27cd7338ab82f26546b0c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-ZX1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
Here is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-PM2 versus Panasonic ZR1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and ZR1 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and ZR1 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PM2 was announced 3 years later than the ZR1 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZR1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-PM2 matches up against the ZR1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic ZR1
E-PM2 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 47 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus E-PM2
ZR1 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic ZR1
E-PM2 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 comes with external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZR1 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PM2 versus Panasonic ZR1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-PM2 versus the ZR1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8390/b83907bd2bf53c61fd117bb4022e73800c9ccb19" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and ZR1 is 89 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd8de/cd8ded2deb531dbe24ade96a7c81ab3b33e27294" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The visual here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM2 and ZR1.
Plainly, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will render extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher E-PM2 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79ea3/79ea325873d9b31b27ee2b62084d2de4c727f7b1" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c402/2c4029f4a43c711d2ac93fd1ebf6ccc5793581d5" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 5.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 pounds) | 158g (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $448 | $280 |