Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58335/5833596ee00df61640e59d2c257f4e05c3bd6638" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 208g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Released June 2012
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ25
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic ZS15, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and ZS15 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and ZS15 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-PM2 was announced 11 months after the ZS15 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS15 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-PM2 grades versus the ZS15 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Panasonic ZS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic ZS15
E-PM2 | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2013 | ![]() | June 2012 | Newer by 11 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS15 over the Olympus E-PM2
ZS15 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic ZS15
E-PM2 | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 has got physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS15 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic ZS15 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-PM2 vs the ZS15.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7f08/f7f08519a87a63b2b985f818011a2b7d7dacf3cf" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and ZS15 is 89 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ccc2/0ccc2c292320987755be4175955ad3fc7848c3e4" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading a spec sheet. The picture below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and ZS15.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 using its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will deliver more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The newer E-PM2 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6343/a63430b68bbc84eacde8a6945db7fcc31ccd3538" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbcee/fbceef2e40e985b7799eada23a0615907ddc630b" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS15 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 |
Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ25 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2012-06-29 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 15 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 260 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $448 | $279 |