Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17f5c/17f5cd4f03c94030eab99c5ab77b6a4371e5b9be" alt="Pentax K-S2 front Pentax K-S2 front"
64 Imaging
63 Features
82 Overall
70
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 678g - 123 x 91 x 73mm
- Released February 2015
- Superseded the Pentax K-S1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PM2 versus Pentax K-S2, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the K-S2 (20MP) is relatively comparable but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and K-S2 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PM2 was introduced 21 months prior to the K-S2 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-S2 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the K-S2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Pentax K-S2. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Pentax K-S2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Pentax K-S2
E-PM2 | K-S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-S2 over the Olympus E-PM2
K-S2 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | May 2013 | More recent by 21 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Pentax K-S2
E-PM2 | K-S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 comes with outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Pentax K-S2 has specifications of 123mm x 91mm x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") along with a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PM2 versus Pentax K-S2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PM2 and the K-S2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97c13/97c13719d258eacaf7292dc7b8b221fd5a135822" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and K-S2 is 89 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db5ad/db5ad8611cf7f00cb0d75209a34d67c7e2ccbdc0" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements just by seeing specs. The photograph underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM2 and K-S2.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PM2 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Pentax K-S2 will produce greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older E-PM2 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad533/ad533413bd3e9c03ada3675a798193b1a21e0e1f" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb4da8f0dac5fd65a6eae517443c9c063ba3f9" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax K-S2 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Pentax K-S2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Pentax K-S2 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2013-05-21 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | PRIME MII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 5.4 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lb) | 678 gr (1.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 123 x 91 x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 410 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $448 | $581 |