Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax RZ18
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax RZ18 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax RZ18 Overview
Below is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-PM2 versus Pentax RZ18, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the RZ18 (16MP) is fairly similar but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and RZ18 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-PM2 was released 21 months later than the RZ18 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax RZ18 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-PM2 matches up against the RZ18 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax RZ18 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Pentax Optio RZ18. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Pentax RZ18 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Pentax RZ18
E-PM2 | RZ18 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2013 | September 2011 | More recent by 21 months | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ18 over the Olympus E-PM2
RZ18 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Pentax RZ18
E-PM2 | RZ18 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax RZ18 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 features exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Pentax RZ18 has specifications of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PM2 versus Pentax RZ18 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-PM2 and the RZ18.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and RZ18 is 89 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax RZ18 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specs. The graphic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and RZ18.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses the exact same MP but not the same sensor measurements. The E-PM2 includes the larger sensor which will make getting shallow DOF less difficult. The more recent E-PM2 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax RZ18 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax RZ18 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Pentax Optio RZ18 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Pentax Optio RZ18 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-05-21 | 2011-09-12 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 4cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 2.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) | 178 gr (0.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $448 | $210 |