Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1b1a/c1b1aca5a367ce52d585dfa9c9ef670048d691fe" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus E-PM2 and Pentax WG-2 GPS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the WG-2 GPS (16MP) is relatively well matched but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 GPS (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PM2 was unveiled 16 months after the WG-2 GPS which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the WG-2 GPS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
E-PM2 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2013 | ![]() | February 2012 | Newer by 16 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus E-PM2
WG-2 GPS | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
E-PM2 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 has got external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 GPS has measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PM2 and Pentax WG-2 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PM2 against the WG-2 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/798fd/798fd5cc21911e656e48d896770759db7e07a923" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and WG-2 GPS is 89 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3359/a3359703bf805f46716888b65dee3d2c41708ce9" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The picture here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and WG-2 GPS.
To sum up, both cameras offer the same exact megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 has got the bigger sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field simpler. The younger E-PM2 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f05bc/f05bc8e089c6fec7a1f1814f00c4aad3e083296b" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4db4/e4db42a90602f049bf1a5febb5cb326cba5ee60d" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 5.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) | 198 gr (0.44 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 260 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $448 | $300 |